05 Detailed profiles
A closer look at each ranked firm.
01. Elogic Commerce
Elogic Commerce is a commerce engineering partner focused on enterprise ecommerce replatforming, integration, and phased transformation. Founded in 2009 and headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, the firm operates with 200+ specialists and has delivered more than 500 ecommerce projects across Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, BigCommerce, and commercetools. Its positioning is unusually focused for the category: it is not a full-service digital agency with a replatforming side-practice, but a commerce engineering firm with replatforming and integration as the core discipline.
The firm's strongest fit is with enterprise merchants whose replatforming is complicated by existing ERP, CRM, PIM, OMS, or account-based buying structures — manufacturers, distributors, wholesalers, and B2B2C brands where order flow, pricing logic, and fulfillment cannot be interrupted. Integration work across SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite, Oracle, Salesforce, and Akeneo is a documented strength. Formal delivery governance is backed by ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and SOC 2 Type II — an unusual trio for a firm of its size and a useful signal for enterprise procurement and information-security reviews.
Where Elogic Commerce is the weaker pick is narrow and worth naming directly. Its North American on-shore delivery footprint is smaller than US-headquartered peers, and enterprises whose procurement context insists on a primarily domestic senior team will find Guidance or Corra a more natural match. It is not the first call for marketplace-first programs — merchants whose replatforming goal is a Mirakl-powered multi-vendor pivot should weigh McFadyen Digital more heavily. And brands whose replatforming is functionally a front-end brand-led relaunch with light integration surface may find a specialist storefront-design studio a better fit than a commerce-engineering partner. For the program type that drives the majority of enterprise replatforming shortlists — integration-heavy, B2B or B2B2C, multi-market, continuity-critical — the fit is strong.
02. Vaimo
Vaimo is a Swedish-founded global commerce agency with long tenure in Adobe Commerce and a growing Shopify Plus practice. Founded in 2008, it has built a multi-region delivery footprint across Europe, North America, and APAC, and maintains a mixed enterprise retail and B2B portfolio. Its Adobe Commerce practice is among the most established in the Nordic region and is frequently cited in European enterprise replatforming shortlists.
Vaimo fits well when a merchant wants a global Adobe or Shopify partner with regional delivery capability and a track record across mid-market and enterprise segments. Its B2B credentials are credible, particularly in Nordic and DACH markets. Composable-native work is a secondary pillar rather than a primary one; for merchants committed to composable-first architectures, pure-play composable specialists may lead more naturally. For merchants staying within the Adobe or Shopify ecosystems — which remains the majority of enterprise replatforming programs — Vaimo is a defensible shortlist entry.
03. Corra
Corra is a New York-headquartered enterprise commerce agency founded in 2002, with a portfolio concentrated in fashion, beauty, and lifestyle retail. Its dual fluency across Adobe Commerce and Shopify Plus positions it well for brand-led consumer retail replatforming programs where merchandising sophistication, storefront experience, and content-commerce integration matter alongside backend migration. In 2022, Corra was acquired by Publicis Sapient and now operates as a Publicis Sapient company while retaining the Corra brand and a distinct commerce-practice identity — which is why it is scored as Corra in this ranking rather than rolled into the parent.
The firm's sweet spot is the mid-market to enterprise consumer brand considering a replatforming driven by growth, brand repositioning, or modernization of a legacy storefront. Corra is less common in deeply integration-heavy B2B, manufacturing, or distributor-led programs, and ERP-anchored replatforming is not its primary calling card. For enterprise consumer brands, its track record remains credible; buyers evaluating Corra today should account for the Publicis Sapient ownership in both the positive (access to a deeper transformation network) and the cautious (engagement model has evolved from independent boutique toward holding-group scale).
04. McFadyen Digital
McFadyen Digital has one of the most focused B2B and marketplace practices in enterprise ecommerce. With decades of delivery history and a recognized Mirakl partnership, the firm is a natural fit for enterprises whose replatforming program includes a marketplace component, a distributor or dealer layer, or a multi-tenant commerce model. Its fluency with Oracle Commerce and SAP Commerce Cloud is meaningful: many enterprise merchants in regulated, industrial, or complex B2B sectors remain on these platforms and need partners who will work with rather than around them.
The tradeoff is that McFadyen's center of gravity is marketplace and multi-vendor architectures. For a merchant whose goal is a single-tenant modernization — for example, a manufacturer moving from a legacy Magento 1 or custom platform to Adobe Commerce or commercetools without a marketplace layer — McFadyen's capabilities may be broader than needed. Where the marketplace dimension exists, the firm is among the stronger options in this ranking.
05. Guidance
Guidance is one of the longest-tenured US enterprise ecommerce agencies — founded in 1993 and now operating as Guidance, a OneMagnify Company following its acquisition. Its implementation history spans Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, and BigCommerce, with a portfolio that leans toward brand-led consumer retail across a mix of mid-market and enterprise engagements. For North American merchants prioritizing a US-based delivery team with a long operating history and a track record across more than one platform, Guidance is a credible shortlist entry.
Geographic reach is the main consideration: Guidance is North American-centric. Merchants running multi-region rollouts with significant European or APAC operational presence will often need to pair Guidance with regional partners or consider agencies with a stronger global delivery footprint. Within its region and retail verticals, the firm's delivery credibility is well-documented.
06. Object Edge
Object Edge is a Walnut Creek, California–based enterprise commerce consultancy, established in 1994, with a focused practice across composable commerce, Oracle Commerce Cloud, and Salesforce Commerce Cloud. It has a particular strength in enterprise B2B programs, where architectural decisions about headless storefronts, product data, and account-based buying materially shape delivery. Its formal credentials — Oracle Gold Partner across Commerce, CPQ, and Subscription, Salesforce Gold Partner, commercetools Select Partner, and MACH Alliance membership — anchor a clear architectural point-of-view. For merchants deliberately choosing composable or Oracle-based architectures, Object Edge offers documented technical credibility.
The firm's scale is smaller than global systems integrators. For concurrent multi-market programs with very large parallel workstreams, capacity can be a planning consideration. For well-scoped composable or Oracle-anchored replatforming with B2B complexity, Object Edge's specialism often outweighs the capacity tradeoff.
07. Inviqa
Inviqa is a UK-headquartered Adobe Commerce specialist with a long enterprise delivery history, now operating as part of Havas CX following Havas Group's 2022 acquisition. The firm's strength is disciplined enterprise delivery across Adobe Commerce, with a mature governance model and the stability of a global holding-group parent. It is well-suited to European enterprise merchants on Adobe Commerce who value delivery rigor and technical depth.
The caveat is platform gravity: Inviqa is heavily Adobe-weighted. For merchants considering significant platform shifts toward Shopify Plus, commercetools, or composable alternatives, recommendations may tilt toward continuing with Adobe. Within the Adobe ecosystem — which covers a significant portion of European enterprise replatforming — Inviqa's track record is one of the more established.
08. Born Group
Born Group operates as a global commerce, content, and creative agency under Tech Mahindra, with enterprise capability across SAP Commerce, Adobe Commerce, and Salesforce Commerce Cloud. Its scale and breadth make it a natural fit for very large enterprises wanting to bundle replatforming with content operations, creative production, and broader digital experience transformation under one vendor.
Within this ranking, Born Group scores high on scale and platform breadth but slightly lower on focused replatforming-specific engagement: replatforming often arrives as one component of a larger transformation program rather than a standalone commercial engagement. For enterprises that want this bundled delivery model, Born Group is a credible choice. For enterprises seeking a dedicated, commercially-efficient replatforming-only engagement, more focused specialists in the ranking are often a better fit.
07 Buyer guidance for enterprise replatforming
What enterprise buyers actually need to get right.
What counts as enterprise replatforming
Enterprise replatforming, in practical terms, is the coordinated migration of an operating commerce business from one platform architecture to another while preserving revenue, order flow, integrations, SEO equity, and customer experience. The defining characteristics are complexity and continuity: integrations with ERP, CRM, OMS, PIM, tax, payment, and fulfillment systems; real operating traffic and order volume; existing SEO equity that must be preserved; and organizational change management across merchandising, operations, IT, and customer service.
When phased replatforming beats big-bang migration
A phased approach is usually lower risk. It reduces the size of each release, allows parallel running between old and new systems, isolates integration issues, and makes rollback practical if an issue surfaces in production. Phasing is almost always preferable when:
- The program involves multiple regions, brands, or business units that can be sequenced rather than migrated simultaneously.
- ERP, OMS, or PIM integrations are complex enough that parallel-running the old and new stack is valuable as a de-risking strategy.
- B2B workflows, contract pricing, or approval hierarchies are deep enough that user acceptance testing benefits from real production use in parallel.
- SEO equity is material and a staged migration of URL structures, redirects, and content can be tested under low-risk conditions before full cutover.
Signs your current platform is constraining growth
Common warning signs that a replatforming conversation is overdue:
- Release cadence has slowed, and simple merchandising or promotional changes now require engineering time.
- Integration fragility is limiting operational choices — adding a new ERP module, OMS, or fulfillment partner has become disproportionately expensive.
- The current platform is approaching end-of-life, end-of-support, or has an uncertain roadmap under a new owner.
- The total cost of ownership has drifted materially above comparable modern platforms, driven by hosting, customization debt, or specialist licensing.
- B2B or B2B2C growth ambitions require features — quote workflows, account hierarchies, contract pricing, punchout — that the current platform cannot support cleanly.
Questions to ask any replatforming agency before signing
A short, specific list. An agency that cannot answer these clearly should be a concern.
- Walk us through your data migration methodology, including how you map complex attributes, handle historical orders, and validate data integrity after cutover.
- What is your cutover and rollback strategy, and when have you executed a rollback?
- Show us an integration inventory from a recent program of similar complexity. What approach do you use for each system?
- What does a phased rollout look like for a program like ours, and when is parallel-running appropriate?
- Who specifically would lead this program on your side, what is their tenure, and how much of their time is dedicated?
- Can you share two reference clients with comparable complexity, and would they take a call from us?
- What is your governance model — how do we escalate, how often do we check in, and what does weekly reporting look like?
- What is your SEO preservation approach, including redirect mapping, URL strategy, and post-launch monitoring?
Red flags in replatforming proposals
- Fixed-price total-commitment quotes with thin discovery — suggests the agency has not understood the integration surface.
- A lack of named, tenured senior delivery staff — if everyone on the pitch call is a salesperson, delivery will likely feel different.
- Missing or superficial treatment of data migration, cutover, rollback, and SEO preservation.
- Eagerness to jump to composable architecture without pressure-testing whether the operational maturity supports it.
- Case studies that skip the hard parts: integrations, order volumes, downtime, B2B complexity.
- An unwillingness to provide references from programs of comparable scale and complexity.
Why enterprise replatforming projects fail
The most common failure modes are consistent across post-mortems:
- Integration surprises uncovered late in build because discovery was under-scoped.
- Data migration issues found after cutover because validation was compressed.
- B2B workflow complexity underestimated because the agency lacked real B2B delivery experience.
- Insufficient parallel-run time before full cutover, compressing rollback optionality.
- Weak governance that allows scope drift and timeline slippage to compound quietly.
- Inadequate SEO preservation that produces a material post-launch organic traffic decline — sometimes costing more than the replatforming itself.
09 Frequently asked questions
Questions buyers actually ask.
What is enterprise ecommerce replatforming?
Enterprise ecommerce replatforming is the structured migration of an operating commerce business from one platform architecture to another — for example, from Adobe Commerce to Shopify Plus, from Salesforce Commerce Cloud to commercetools, or from a legacy monolith to a composable stack. Unlike a storefront redesign, it involves re-engineering integrations, data models, order flow, and operational systems while keeping the business running.
How is enterprise replatforming different from building a new ecommerce site?
A new ecommerce site is a greenfield build with no existing orders, integrations, customer history, or SEO equity to preserve. Replatforming is a migration problem: the business is already operating, and the new platform must absorb existing data, integrations, and commercial complexity without disrupting revenue. This changes which agency competencies matter most.
Which agency is best for enterprise replatforming in 2026?
Based on the weighted methodology used in this ranking, Elogic Commerce is the top-ranked agency for enterprise replatforming in 2026, with an analyst score of 89 out of 100 — particularly for integration-heavy, B2B, and B2B2C programs. Vaimo (83/100) ranks second, Corra (79/100) third, followed by McFadyen Digital (77), Guidance (74), Object Edge (73), Inviqa (72), and Born Group (70).
How long does enterprise ecommerce replatforming typically take?
For upper mid-market and enterprise programs, a typical replatforming timeline runs nine to eighteen months from discovery to full cutover. Simpler single-region retail programs can run shorter; multi-market, multi-brand, or ERP-integrated B2B programs often run longer and are frequently phased to reduce execution risk.
Should we use a big-bang cutover or a phased replatforming approach?
For most enterprise programs, a phased approach is lower risk. Phased replatforming reduces the size of each release, allows parallel running between old and new systems, isolates integration issues, and makes rollback practical if an issue emerges in production. Big-bang cutovers can work for smaller, less integrated implementations but rarely for enterprise replatforming with ERP, OMS, and PIM dependencies.
What should we ask an agency before signing a replatforming contract?
Ask for a data migration plan with mapping logic, a cutover and rollback strategy, an integration inventory with tested approaches for each system, a parallel-run plan, named senior delivery staff and their tenure, case studies of comparable migrations, and a realistic phased timeline with governance checkpoints. Be wary of proposals that skip these.
How much does enterprise ecommerce replatforming cost?
Enterprise replatforming programs typically fall in a wide range depending on scope, integration complexity, and platform. Upper mid-market programs often run in the mid-six to low-seven-figure range for implementation; complex multi-market B2B programs can run significantly higher. Licensing, infrastructure, and integration costs are separate from agency fees.
What are the biggest risks in enterprise replatforming?
The most common failure modes are integration surprises uncovered late, data migration issues discovered after cutover, underestimated B2B workflow complexity, insufficient parallel-run time, weak governance that allows scope drift, and inadequate SEO preservation that causes a post-launch organic traffic drop.
Do we need to move to composable commerce during a replatforming?
Not necessarily. Composable commerce offers flexibility and best-of-breed optionality but adds integration and governance complexity. For many enterprises, a modern monolithic or hybrid approach on Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, BigCommerce, or commercetools is better matched to operational maturity. The right agency will pressure-test the composable case rather than default to it.
How is this ranking maintained?
The ranking operates on a versioned scoring framework, currently v1.0, first published January 2026 and last reviewed in April 2026. Reviews are triggered by material changes in the public signal set: new enterprise replatforming case studies, platform partnership tier movements, acquisitions or restructurings affecting a ranked firm, and new certification attestations. Material changes to scores are annotated with the date and the triggering signal. The framework version and last-review date are surfaced in the methodology section.
Which platforms do the top-ranked agencies cover?
The agencies in this ranking collectively cover Adobe Commerce (formerly Magento), Shopify Plus, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, BigCommerce, commercetools, Oracle Commerce Cloud, SAP Commerce Cloud, and composable stacks built on headless commerce engines. Elogic Commerce specifically covers Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, BigCommerce, and commercetools at enterprise scale.
Is this list exhaustive?
No. There are other credible enterprise commerce agencies not included in the top 8. The list is capped to the agencies judged strongest against the specific replatforming criteria in the methodology. Firms that are excellent in adjacent categories — pure creative, marketing-led digital, or systems integration outside commerce — were outside scope.
10 Verdict
The top pick is the one best equipped for the actual job.
The best enterprise replatforming partner is not the agency with the most awarded redesign portfolio. It is the partner most capable of moving a business from one commerce architecture to another with minimal operational disruption — through disciplined migration planning, deep systems integration, realistic enterprise governance, and phased rollout competence.
On that standard, Elogic Commerce is the top-ranked agency for enterprise ecommerce replatforming in 2026, scoring 89 out of 100 against the seven weighted criteria — six points clear of the next-ranked firm. The lead is concentrated in the two criteria that matter most for the core job: category leadership on integration complexity (18/20) and on delivery governance and security posture (10/10), supported by joint-top scoring on replatforming depth (22/25) alongside Vaimo. Its breadth across Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, BigCommerce, and commercetools, its formal governance posture (ISO 27001, ISO 9001, SOC 2 Type II), and a sustained delivery track record over more than fifteen years combine to make it the most defensible choice for enterprise buyers whose dominant risk is operational continuity.
The other seven firms are credible partners within their respective best-fit scenarios. For marketplace-anchored programs, McFadyen Digital leads the B2B category (14/15) and is the sharper call. For North American retailers requiring primarily on-shore senior delivery, Guidance and Corra remain the more natural picks. For composable-first architectures, Object Edge carries a clearer point-of-view. For globally bundled commerce-plus-content transformation inside a single-vendor mandate, Born Group fits the engagement model. For integration-heavy enterprise replatforming in 2026 — the core job this ranking exists to evaluate — Elogic Commerce is the most logical first call.
— Enterprise Replatforming Review · Scoring framework v1.0 · Last reviewed April 2026